| Performance of RNTCP Case Detection, Smear Conversion, Treatment Outcomes and Notification by Private Sector under Revised National Tuberculosis Programme (RNTCP) in South Garo Hills District (Meghalya) (2012 and 2013) | ||
| Sector | South Garo Hills | Meghalaya |
| Population (in Lakh) Covered by RNTCP * | ||
| Number of Suspects Examined | ||
| Suspects Examined per Lakh Population per Quarter | ||
| Rate of Change in Suspects Examined per Lakh Population (Compared Previous Year) | ||
| Number of Smear Positive Patients DiagNumbersed ** | ||
| Suspects Examined per Smear Positive Case DiagNumbersed | ||
| Rate of Change in Suspects Examined per S+ Case DiagNumbersed Compared to Previous Year) | ||
| Annual Smear Positive Case Detection Rate (From PMR) | ||
| Annual Smear Positive Case Notification Rate [From CFR: SM + Cases (NSP + Rel + TAD)/ Pop] | ||
| Total Patients Registered for Treatment $ | ||
| Annual Total Case Notification Rate | ||
| Annual New Smear Positive Case Notification Rate | ||
| Total Cases Numberfied by Private Sector in 2013 | ||
| Numbertification Rate per 100000 Population (Private Sector) | ||
| Annual New Smear Negative Case Notification Rate | ||
| Annual New Extra Pulmonary Case Notification Rate | ||
| Annual Previously Treated Case Notification Rate | ||
| Annual Previously Treated Smear Positive Case Notification Rate | ||
| Number (%) of Pediatric Cases Out of All New Cases | ||
| 3 Month Conversion Rate of New Smear Positive Patients4 | ||
| 3 Month Conversion Rate of Retreatment Patients4 | ||
| Treatment Success Rate of New Smear Positive Patients5 | ||
| Treatment Success Rate Among Smearpositive Previously Treated Cases5 | ||
| Number (%) of All Smear Positive Cases Started RNTCP DOTS Within 7 Days of DiagNumbersis | ||
| Number (%) of All Smear Positive Cases Registered Within one Month of Starting RNTCP DOTS Treatment | ||
| Number (%) of All Cured Smear Positive Cases Having End of Treatment Follow- Up Sputum Done Within 7 Days of Last Dose | ||
| Number (%) of Cases (All Forms of TB) Registered Receiving DOT Through A Community Volunteer | ||
| Proportion of All Registered TB Cases With Known HIV Status | ||
| Proportion of TB Patients Known to be HIV Infected Among Tested | ||
| Proportion of TB Patients Known to be HIV Infected Among Registered | ||
| Proportion of HIV Infected TB Patients Put on CPT (Rt Report) | ||
| Proportion of HIV Infected TB Patients Put on Art (Rtreport) | ||
| Number of Health Facilities Registered Laboratories - Private) in 2013 | ||
| Number of Health Facilities Registered (Single Clinic - Private) in 2013 | ||
| Number of Health Facilities Registered (Multiclicnic - Private) in 2013 | ||
| Number of Patients Numbertified by (Laboratories - Private) in 2013 | ||
| Number of Patients Numbertified by (Single Clinic - Private) in 2013 | ||
| Number of Patients Numbertified by (Multiclinic - Private) in 2013 | ||
